Showing posts with label Central Seminary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Central Seminary. Show all posts

March 5, 2015

Piedmont/TTU: A Predictable Pattern of Mergers With Only One Survivor

Tragic, isn’t it? It has not been a delight to report on a pattern of the predictable demise of once fine, not perfect, schools. That’s right, “demise.”  One survives and the other goes away.
“…but the merger effectively means that come May 1, Tennessee Temple University will no longer exist.” (The End of Tennessee Temple in Chattanooga, Times Free Press, March 3, 2015).
Last time we considered Tennessee Temple’s demise, being folded into Piedmont International University.1 Look at the schools that already have or may be near to folding.  Is there common denominator?  There are, in my opinion, two factors, to be considered.  First, and foremost, was these schools becoming in practice like, and aligning with the non-separatism of so-called “conservative” evangelicalism.

Second, while possibly less of a negative impact than the former, these schools also drifted into allowing for and tolerating two major doctrinal errors.  Those errors are: 1) Reformed Theology, which includes Calvinism and Covenant theology. 2) Lordship Salvation (LS), which is a works based, man-centered message that corrupts the simplicity that is in Christ (2 Cor. 11:3) and frustrates grace (Gal. 2:21).2 That said, some of our schools have been or lean toward Calvinism and enjoyed relative health.

Schools that get dislodged from their biblical separatist roots, and veer away from their constituencies cannot survive. Pillsbury, Northland, Central Seminary and TTU learned this the hard way. On the theological grid, I think many of our separatists are regrettably willing to endure Calvinism and even LS more so than they are willing to endure a false eschatology and hermeneutic (“the church is Israel” – “Historic Premill,” etc.).

Consider the Association of Certified Biblical Counselors (ACBC), formerly known as NANC, and their link to Jay Adams. That marriage paved the way for Reformed Theology to make deep inroads into our own ranks.



I would, furthermore, offer and repeat a serious caution: When it comes to the star personalities of the so-called “conservative” evangelicalism, including cooperative ministry, Drs. Kevin Bauder and Dave Doran are willing to tolerate, allow for, ignore and excuse all sorts of aberrant theology (including Reformed, Covenant theology) ecumenical compromises, cultural relativism and worldliness.  Those men (Bauder, Doran, et., al.) through casting aside authentic biblical separatism, paved the way for Covenant Theology to make deep inroads into our circles, and essentially ruin nearly an entire generation of young preachers.  Dr. Ernest Pickering wrote,


“Some leaders operate on the principle that they will use speakers who are well-known even though they may be shaky in their convictions in some areas-because they have special abilities that are helpful and thus can be a blessing to their congregations. The wisdom, however, of following this course of action is very doubtful…. But a man is more than his pulpit message. He brings to the pulpit a lifetime of associations, actions and perhaps writings. He comes as a total person. Is he in his total ministry the type of person you would want the young people at the separatist college to emulate? If he is a compromiser, his example would be harmful, and the college president would be at fault for setting him up as such. The separatist cause is not advanced by featuring non-separatists.”3 (Biblical Separation: The Struggle for a Pure Church, Implementing Separatist Convictions, Whom to Invite to Your Platform, p. 229.)


Predictions:
Where we stand today gone are Pillsbury Baptist Bible College, Northland Baptist Bible College (NIU), Calvary Baptist Seminary and Tennessee Temple.  As for my personal opinion of other schools traditionally in our circles: I suspect Central Seminary will soon join the others in closing. How Bob Jones University fares will in part depend upon how new president Steve Pettit aligns with some of the drifting churches in Greenville, i.e. Heritage Bible, Hampton Park, etc.

Maranatha Baptist University, I believe, and am hopeful will be with us well into the future.  Ambassador Baptist College is debt free, and I believe is being lead well by Ron Comfort’s successor, Alton Beal. The Baptist College of Ministry & Theological Seminary is on sure footing for a long term future.  It seems to me that Pensacola Christian, West Coast and Crown College will around for many years to come.

In all of these closures I wondered where does Piedmont fit it.  TTU is not the first to be absorbed by Piedmont.  Previous to TTU Piedmont absorbed Spurgeon Baptist Bible College of FL., and Atlantic Bible College, VA.  Piedmont also got libraries from other sources. While Piedmont claims to keep the schools alive they have simply digested them.  These were not, unlike most mergers, [un]like a marriage,” because only one entity (Piedmont) has, thus far, survived and the other(s) have gone away.



LM

Related Reading:
Discussion…the Closing of Pillsbury Baptist Bible College
Although Pillsbury struggled for a number of years to recover itself [from its slide into evangelical compromise], it never really dealt with, in any real tangible way, its ruined reputation. Although this was repeatedly brought before them by many people, they never really did what was necessary to regain the trust of the Gatekeepers who send students.” (11/06/2008)
Northland…Culmination of a Modern Day Tragedy
For the many fine former NBBC faculty, staff and graduates this is indeed a tragic and closing chapter for their alma mater.  Northland once was unique and unwavering in its fidelity to the whole counsel of God.  Under Matt Olson’s tenure as president the school was steadily lead into compromise and ultimately ruined for the cause of Christ.” (10/15/2014)
Closure of Calvary Baptist Seminary: Predictable & Repeatable
Calvary joins Pillsbury in its demise. I…believe we will see the closure of NIU and Central Baptist Seminary (MN). For drifting far from their original markers as fundamental Baptist separatist schools NIU and Central will not survive. NIU and Central will not survive having become non-separatist, evangelical schools. They will not survive having alienated their base and alumni!” (8/20/2013)
CBS is Accountable for Failure & Won’t Own Up to It

My opinion is that these men fell prey to the desire to be somebody and became very focused on their own motivations and what they wanted out of life. Unfortunately they’ve gotten the outcome of what happens when you do things that way. It’s obvious they are upset about the failure and they have tried to put the best face forward on the closure by calling it a success or celebration. The reality is that they are accountable for the failure of the seminary and just won’t own up to it.” (6/15/2014)
Footnotes:

2) See, Summarizing Lordship Salvation From a Single Page of John MacArthur's books

3) For Dr. Pickering’s complete comment see, The Separatist Cause is Not Advanced by Featuring Non-Separatists

February 22, 2013

Kevin Bauder to Choose Between Ernest Pickering and John MacArthur

Today, at Sharper Iron (SI), Pastor Don Johnson has reiterated an important question to Dr. Kevin Bauder.  (See an important update below) It was a question among three.  At great length Kevin addressed Don’s latter questions on Drs. Clearwaters and Dollar, which included attempts to redirect elsewhere. The first, the primary question was not touched on at all by Kevin. Don’s original (unanswered) question to Kevin on Wednesday (2/20/13) was,
How about Central Seminary? A past president published a pamphlet on the MacArthur [Lordship Salvation] issue and said that MacArthur was “changing the terms of the gospel.” What have you done about that? That would be Dr. Pickering, a man I highly respect and greatly admire. I don’t think anyone at Central needs to dig up this episode and make any statement of apology or amends, but if you are going to be consistent, surely you should push for something of the sort. Especially since you are much more tightly connected to Central than you are to the FBFI.”
Following is the exact quote in its full context as it appears on p. 7 of Dr. Pickering’s booklet, Lordship Salvation: An Examination of John MacArthur’s Book, The Gospel According to Jesus.
Dr. Ernest Pickering
John MacArthur is a sincere servant of the Lord, of that we have no doubt.... We believe in his advocacy of the so-called lordship salvation he is wrong. He desperately desires to see holiness, lasting fruit, and continuing faithfulness in the lives of Christian people. This reviewer and we believe all sincere church leaders desire the same.... But the remedy for this condition is not found in changing the terms of the gospel.”
This morning Don has asked Kevin, for the second time, to address directly Dr. Pickering’s statement that John MacArthur, through Lordship Salvation (LS), was “changing the terms of the gospel.”
Now, I do note that you didn’t address the comment by Pickering regarding MacArthur’s Lordship Salvation – ‘changing the terms of the gospel.’ According to a paper published by Jeff Straub the pamphlet was originally published by Central Seminary. That’s a pretty serious charge - was it right or wrong? If wrong, has Central done anything about it?”
In yet another lengthy comment by Kevin this morning, following Don’s reiteration above, he (Kevin) still has offered nothing to Don’s now two requests for an answer about Dr. Pickering’s published statement that John MacArthur was “changing the terms of the gospel.”

Gospel-centric” fellowship and “gospel-driven” separation is the new mantra, the new way of determining fellowship and cooperative ministry for Kevin Bauder, Dave Doran, Tim Jordan and Matt Olson.  Don’s question about Drs. Pickering, MacArthur and the LS controversy puts Kevin is in a difficult spot because the rallying point, the magnetic attraction for their gospel centric fellowship is the Lordship Salvation interpretation of the gospel.

Lordship Salvation is the soteriology of virtually every evangelical from John MacArthur to John Piper. Kevin’s recent claim that he has a problem with the T4G men because of what he calls (without defining specifically) “a fairly strong version of Lordship Salvation” does not give him any middle ground for or escape mechanism from Don’s question.  Lordship Salvation, as John MacArthur or any of the T4G men defines it, is a false non-saving message that corrupts the simplicity that is in Christ (2 Cor. 11:3).

Imo, it is impossible to find middle ground on this question.  Either Dr. Pickering was right in his review of MacArthur’s original edition of The Gospel According to Jesus or he was wrong to say that MacArthur was “changing the terms the gospel.” Kevin Bauder is going to have to choose between the two men.
Kevin Bauder is going to choose between faith only (Ernest Pickering) and Lordship Salvation’s faith plus commitment of life (John MacArthur) messages.1
You can read Don’s first question above as I have cited it here.  I am linking you to his second question to Kevin Bauder on the Pickering statement.2 I want you and I to see together whether Kevin answer and if he does answer will he give a clear, unvarnished answer. Actually, I expect Kevin to take from the political liberals play book and post a long, wordy response in which he prevaricates (beats around the bush) his answer, never really answering at all.

Incidentally, at SI Kevin closed today with, “Through Sunday, I have almost nonstop responsibilities. Itll take me a while to get another serious post up.” We, therefore, will wait until next week for Kevin’s answer.


LM

Article Update: (2/23) Today, we have Don Johnson drawing Kevin’s attention once again to the Pickering/MacArthur question.  Within an extended comment at SI Don directed the following to Kevin Bauder.

“On the other hand, I raised the issue of Dr. Pickering’s statement about MacArthur while he was president of Central - it seems to me to be a parallel issue. You [Kevin Bauder] haven’t addressed it at all. It is all very well to say that we must deal with sins of the past as a general principle, but the reason we sidestep them, it seems to me, is that 1) we think the issue is presently a non-issue because it is long in the past; 2) we think the issue is a non-issue for us because we weren’t a party to it; 3) we think that there are some aspects of the issue that were merited on the ‘sinning side’ (as it were). Are any of those the reasons why you keep avoiding the Central published pamphlet that said MacArthur changed the terms of the gospel?” (bold mine)
Footnotes:
1) “The message of faith only and the message of faith plus commitment of life cannot both be the gospel; therefore, one of them is a false gospel and comes under the curse of perverting the gospel or preaching another gospel (Gal. 1:6-9), and this is a very serious matter.” (Dr. Charles Ryrie, Balancing the Christian Life, p. 170.)

2) Don’s second of two questions to Kevin Bauder on Dr. Pickering’s statement that John MacArthur was “changing the terms of the gospel.”

Related Reading: