Today, at Sharper Iron (SI), Pastor Don Johnson has
reiterated an important question to Dr. Kevin Bauder. (See an important update below) It was a question among three. At great length Kevin addressed Don’s latter
questions on Drs. Clearwaters and Dollar, which included attempts to redirect
elsewhere. The first, the primary question was not touched on at all by Kevin. Don’s original (unanswered) question to Kevin on Wednesday (2/20/13) was,
“How about Central Seminary? A past president
published a pamphlet on the MacArthur [Lordship Salvation] issue and said that
MacArthur was “changing the terms of the
gospel.” What have you done about that? That would be Dr. Pickering, a man
I highly respect and greatly admire. I don’t think anyone at Central needs to
dig up this episode and make any statement of apology or amends, but if you are
going to be consistent, surely you should push for something of the sort.
Especially since you are much more tightly connected to Central than you are to
the FBFI.”
Following is the exact quote in its full
context as it appears on p. 7 of Dr. Pickering’s booklet, Lordship
Salvation: An Examination of John MacArthur’s Book, The Gospel According to
Jesus.
 |
| Dr. Ernest Pickering |
“John MacArthur is
a sincere servant of the Lord, of that we have no doubt.... We believe in his
advocacy of the so-called lordship salvation he is wrong. He desperately desires to see holiness, lasting fruit,
and continuing faithfulness in the lives of Christian people. This reviewer and
we believe all sincere church leaders desire the same.... But the remedy for
this condition is not found in changing
the terms of the gospel.”
This morning Don
has asked Kevin, for the second time, to address directly Dr. Pickering’s statement
that John MacArthur, through Lordship Salvation (LS), was “changing
the terms of the gospel.”
“Now, I do note that you didn’t address the
comment by Pickering regarding MacArthur’s Lordship Salvation – ‘changing the
terms of the gospel.’ According to a paper published by Jeff Straub the
pamphlet was originally published by Central Seminary. That’s a pretty serious
charge - was it right or wrong? If
wrong, has Central done anything about it?”
In yet another
lengthy comment by Kevin this morning, following Don’s reiteration above, he (Kevin) still has offered
nothing to Don’s now two requests for an answer about Dr. Pickering’s published statement
that John MacArthur was “changing the
terms of the gospel.”
“Gospel-centric” fellowship and “gospel-driven” separation is the new
mantra, the new way of determining fellowship and cooperative ministry for Kevin
Bauder, Dave Doran, Tim Jordan and Matt Olson.
Don’s question about Drs. Pickering, MacArthur and the LS controversy
puts Kevin is in a difficult spot because the rallying point, the magnetic
attraction for their gospel centric
fellowship is the Lordship Salvation interpretation of the gospel.
Lordship
Salvation is the soteriology of virtually every evangelical from John MacArthur
to John Piper. Kevin’s recent
claim that he has a problem with the T4G men because of what he calls (without
defining specifically) “a fairly strong
version of Lordship Salvation” does not give him any middle ground
for or escape mechanism from Don’s question.
Lordship Salvation, as John MacArthur or any of the T4G men defines it, is a false non-saving message that corrupts the simplicity that is in Christ (2 Cor. 11:3).
Imo, it is impossible
to find middle ground on this question. Either
Dr. Pickering was right in his review of MacArthur’s original edition of The Gospel According to Jesus or he was wrong
to say that MacArthur was “changing the terms
the gospel.” Kevin Bauder is going to have to choose between the two men.
Kevin Bauder is going to choose between faith
only (Ernest Pickering) and Lordship Salvation’s faith plus commitment of life (John MacArthur) messages.1
You can read
Don’s first question above as I have cited it here. I am linking you to his second question to
Kevin Bauder on the Pickering statement.2
I want you and I to see together whether Kevin answer and if he does answer will
he give a clear, unvarnished answer. Actually, I expect Kevin to take from the political liberals
’ play book and post a
long, wordy response in which he prevaricates (beats around the bush) his
answer, never really answering at all.
Incidentally, at
SI Kevin closed today with, “Through
Sunday, I have almost nonstop responsibilities. It’ll take me a while to get
another serious post up.” We, therefore, will wait until next week for Kevin’s
answer.
LM
Article Update:
(2/23) Today, we have Don Johnson drawing Kevin’s attention once again to the
Pickering/MacArthur question. Within an extended
comment at SI Don directed the following to Kevin Bauder.
“On the other
hand, I raised the issue of Dr. Pickering’s statement about MacArthur while he
was president of Central - it seems to me to be a parallel issue. You
[Kevin Bauder] haven’t addressed it at all. It is all very well to say
that we must deal with sins of the past as a general principle, but the reason
we sidestep them, it seems to me, is that 1) we think the issue is presently a
non-issue because it is long in the past; 2) we think the issue is a non-issue
for us because we weren’t a party to it; 3) we think that there are some
aspects of the issue that were merited on the ‘sinning side’ (as it were). Are
any of those the reasons why you keep avoiding the Central published
pamphlet that said MacArthur changed the terms of the gospel?” (bold
mine)
Footnotes:
1)
“The
message of faith only and the message of faith plus commitment of life cannot
both be the gospel; therefore, one of them is a false gospel and comes under
the curse of perverting the gospel or preaching another gospel (Gal. 1:6-9),
and this is a very serious matter.”
(Dr. Charles Ryrie, Balancing the Christian Life, p. 170.)
2) Don’s second of two questions to Kevin Bauder on Dr. Pickering’s statement that John
MacArthur was “changing the terms of the
gospel.”
Related Reading: