The
difference between these two foundational issues is critical to life and death.
It is clearly demonstrated in the third chapter of Genesis. God is the
authority, and everything He utters is true and flawless. Eve allows the devil
to deny God’s Word and add his own ideas to God’s words. Then Eve follows that
error and adds some words of her own. God’s Word is wholly without error; its
statements are pure truth. Repeating what God has said is always trustworthy.
This is the correct process of thinking with the words and mind of God. The
majority of individuals in our world, however, have followed the thinking
process that Satan invented. They deny truth or add error where they choose.
Here you have the conflict between pure truth and truth that has been corrupted.
Some
years ago, I started using a term to clarify this contrast. There are only two
religions on earth. I know Christianity is not really a religion, but please
bear with me. Christianity holds that the eternal, sovereign creator is God and
that our authority is the pure Word of God. The other religion is “Humianity,”
a play on words. All other religions are part of this. The god of Humianity is
man, and his authority is human reason. Once again, you have the contrast of
two authorities, two ways of thinking.
CLEARING
THE AIR
The
problem is that human authority often borrows true statements from God, but
then adjusts them to fit flawed human reason. The sad commentary is that
believers who should know better often take the clear statements of scripture
and either add to them or do the unthinkable - they deny the plain statements
of scripture. Believers who can’t find the answer they were looking for simply
go ahead and invent one. Unfortunately, the discipline of Systematic Theology
is full of these inventions. They call them “different points of view.”
Just
a reminder, in case you may have forgotten: Shepherd’s Staff isn’t about
forcing answers on the reader; it is about making people think. So, before you
get all bent out of shape, do some thinking, and beware of borrowing from
flawed human reason.
THE
SAME QUESTION
We
began this discussion by asking “Who taught you to think?” Thank God for
churches, pastors, professors, parents, etc., who have reminded us that true
thinking begins and ends with the Word of God. All other expressions are
opinions. On the other hand, though, we also had teachers who ought to know
better tell us that science, physical evidence, philosophers, and scholars are
the true source of authority. As a result, we borrowed from human thought,
experience, physical evidence, etc., and made them part of our authority. State
education is particularly culpable in this shift of authority. In fact, almost
everyone reading this - if not all of us - have been moved in our thinking and
have adjusted the one trustworthy authority.
Science,
as defined by man, has become an authority higher than God. Let me ask you
this: has science ever been wrong? In the Old Testament, if a prophet gave one
false prophecy, he was stoned. Why would believers ever doubt the clear
statements of Scripture in order to please the false prophecies of science? Is
God wrong - was there indeed a “big bang?” Read the plain statements in the
book of Romans, and consider what God says about those who deny Him as creator.
This,
however is the problem; the god of intellectualism permits men to deny the
things that God has simply stated in His Word. Their argument is that it can’t
really be that simple, so they borrow from another authority to get their way.
That is why “intellectualism complicates to confuse” while the biblical thinker
“simplifies to clarify.”
Science,
falsely so-called, has information, but not truth. It is intellectual, but it
does not have intelligence. Did you forget that those who deny the creator are
absolutely sure that there was no “intelligent design” in what they call
“nature”? It has knowledge, but it does not have wisdom; it has opinion, but
not fact; it has belief, but no final authority.
BRING
IT HOME
It
is easy to pick on intellectual pagans; however, we shudder to consider how
deeply the wrong kind of thinking and the final authority of flawed human
reason have made their way into theology. Most of my day, at this point, is
spent in study and research in the Word. How can it be that theologians in our
camp can go to the same text and come away with a dozen different conclusions?
If they go to the same statements, with the same authority, why do they
disagree? The answer is simple; you cannot go to the same text, and use the
same language system and universal rules, and get more than one answer. I know
that scholars tend to hate simplicity. It robs them of human creativity and the
power to have it their own way. Remember, though, that the Bible was not
written to scholars; it was written to the ordinary humble believer who finds
peace in the fact that each text has only one interpretation. If the answer is
illusive, there may not be an answer; but we certainly are not free to invent
one. That is a major problem with historical theology - it certainly does have
value, but it is not authoritative. An error long held is still an error. Any
idea as to what you are thinking, or how you are thinking? Your next words will
reveal that.
Shepherd’s
Staff is prepared by Clay Nuttall, D. Min.
A communication
service of Shepherd’s Basic Care, for those committed to the authority and sufficiency
of the Bible. Shepherd’s Basic Care is a ministry of information and
encouragement to pastors, missionaries, and churches. Write for information
using the e-mail address shepherdstaff2@juno.com or Shepherdstaff
No comments:
Post a Comment