AXIOM
#12: THE SPIRIT OF GOD HAS NEVER LED ONE CHRISTIAN CONTRARY TO ONE WORD OF THE
WORD OF GOD.
The new evangelical
comes to us as a brother. He has a
philosophy of ministry which appeals to the flesh. It sounds very logical to human reason. But it ignores God’s simple commands such as,
“receive him not into your house,” “come out from among them,” “be ye
separate,” and “touch not the unclean thing.”
When he tells us that the Spirit of God has led him in this new direction,
we must recognize that as a lie; because the Spirit of God has never led one
Christian contrary to one word of the Word of God.
THE MOST DANGEROUS DEVIATION
The
most dangerous deviation is the one closest to your own position. New evangelicalism sprang out of
fundamentalism. It is a movement of
brethren. The lie of new evangelicalism
has deceived more fundamentalists than the siren song of ecumenism. In recent years Jerry Falwell, who still
desires to be called a fundamentalist, has denied the last forty years of
church history and decided that there is really no difference between
fundamentalists and new evangelicals.
His swallowing of the lie of new evangelicalism has led great numbers of
those who follow in his train into the same compromise.
Don’t
let your guard down. Is it right to
allow disobedient brethren kind words from your pulpit? Is it right to allow disobedient brethren to
use your good name? Is it right to let
disobedient brethren have dollars collected from your people? Is it right to allow disobedient brethren to
have the cream of your young people to educate and use in their
enterprise? Say a gracious “No” if you
can. Thunder out a “No!” if you must. But, above all, don’t say “Yes.”
A SCENE OF DEFEAT
There
is a third scene in this chapter. It is
a solemn warning. We see the nameless
prophet’s scene of defeat. In this final
section there are two things—a prediction and a picture.
The
old prophet who issued the lying invitation had not had a prophecy to declare
for the Lord in many years. But as he sat fellowshipping with his younger
brother, the Lord forced him to give a prediction which must have stuck in his
throat. We have it in verses 21 and 22: “And he cried unto the man of God that came
from Judah, saying, Thus saith the Lord, Forasmuch as thou hast disobeyed the
mouth of the Lord, and has not kept the commandment which the Lord thy God commanded thee, but camest
back, and hast eaten bread and drunk water in the place of which the Lord did say to thee, Eat no bread, and
drink no water; thy carcass shall not come unto the sepulchre of thy fathers.”
When
the meal was over the old prophet provided the younger prophet with his own
donkey and sent him on his way. It was
not long until there was a knock on the old man’s door and a neighbor brought
the tragic message of which we read in verses 24, 25: “And when he was gone, a lion met him by the way, and slew him: and his
carcass was cast in the way, and the ass stood beside it, the lion also stood
by the carcass. And, behold, men passed
by, and saw the carcass cast in the way, and the lion standing by the carcass:
and they came and told it in city where the old prophet dwelt.”
I
submit to you that the scene so described is one of the most unnatural scenes
in the Bible. We have a man-eating lion
which would not eat the man he had killed.
We have a donkey which would not run from the lion. Donkeys are not famed for brilliance, but
they have always known enough to run from lions. Man-eating lions eat donkeys for
dessert. In this strange tableau a
man-eating lion and a donkey stood on either side of a prophet’s carcass. The people of the area came and peered around
the rocks to see the strange scene. The
aura of unnaturalness which surrounds this scene is the stamp of God upon
it. God wanted all who passed that way
to know that this was not a man who happened to be killed by a lion, but a
prophet who was executed by his God for disobedience.
We
are always worried what men will think in any given situation. God was not worried about what men would
think. He was concerned only that his
prophet had disobeyed.
Reprinted by permission, The Projector, Spring 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment