tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30991724.post3397522221787803927..comments2024-02-27T03:28:22.684-06:00Comments on In Defense of the Gospel: Dr. Larry Hufhand, Point of View: Wondering AgainLou Martuneachttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08683967904677815711noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30991724.post-79691440687372121672012-10-24T07:44:58.924-05:002012-10-24T07:44:58.924-05:00Thanks for this link. Side bar issue- too bad it i...Thanks for this link. Side bar issue- too bad it is opened and closed with a Rock-n-Roll theme, but given the evangelicals taste for the CCM/Rock/RAP genre, not unexpected. In any event...<br /><br />Mohler opens the video by saying, “<i>I am a historic pre-milenillist</i>.” But then goes on for the rest of the video with the theme, “<i>I am NOT a Dispensationalist…The Bible does not have a chart</i>.”<br /><br />That shared it is needful to remind all readers of an assortment of Mohler’s disconcerting issues, especially that he is an ecumenical compromiser. For a complete review of Mohler’s forays in ecumenical compromise see,<br /><br /><a href="http://indefenseofthegospel.blogspot.com/2009/12/al-mohler-signs-manhattan-declaration.html" rel="nofollow"><b>Al Mohler Signs <i>The Manhattan Declaration</i>, Part 2: Was This a First Time Foray Toward Ecumenism?</b></a><br /><br /><br />LMLou Martuneachttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08683967904677815711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30991724.post-30468557231394429602012-10-23T19:06:42.971-05:002012-10-23T19:06:42.971-05:00http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vPI8ZgIeg0
Thomas...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vPI8ZgIeg0<br /><br />Thomas RhodesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30991724.post-45184426631558801032012-10-23T17:39:09.134-05:002012-10-23T17:39:09.134-05:00I wouldn't call Jonathan Edwards a great theol...I wouldn't call Jonathan Edwards a great theologian. He spread a Calvinistic / Lordship style view of the gospel. Just read Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God. After reading it myself he reminded me of an older version of John MacArthur. Btw... Spurgeon also promoted Calvinism and lordship style error. Just look at his sermon Turn or Burn for an example.Jim Fhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04206814540235700990noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30991724.post-11600084641321320522012-10-23T07:50:05.220-05:002012-10-23T07:50:05.220-05:00Thomas:
Can you offer something from Mohler (hims...Thomas:<br /><br />Can you offer something from Mohler (himself) to substantiate he is NOT Amillennial, but instead premillennial?<br /><br /><br />LM<br />Lou Martuneachttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08683967904677815711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30991724.post-74155842206857026312012-10-23T07:38:34.725-05:002012-10-23T07:38:34.725-05:00Al Mohler is premillennial. John MacArthur doesn&...Al Mohler is premillennial. John MacArthur doesn't have a presbyterian model of church government. They are an independent church.<br /><br />Thomas RhodesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30991724.post-51123722684175486862012-10-22T23:15:58.917-05:002012-10-22T23:15:58.917-05:00Well Dave, we can agree to a point, but for me the...Well Dave, we can agree to a point, but for me the 5 points of Calvinism need to go away too.<br /><br /><br />LMLou Martuneachttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08683967904677815711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30991724.post-87461673326686611672012-10-22T14:31:10.834-05:002012-10-22T14:31:10.834-05:00I agree. We ought to hold to the old, sober Calvi...I agree. We ought to hold to the old, sober Calvinism, and not this new, weaker, sillier version. <br /><br />David Oestreichd4v34xhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07346680257860879900noreply@blogger.com